If God exists, then where he hides?

john-brown-reading-his-bible-1942

If God exists, then where he hides?
In the center or to the sides?
High up above or down below?
This no one seems to know.

Explain what does your god mean,
how he differs from things not seen?
Can you produce one bit of evidence
beyond that of mere pretense?

Quoting scriptures won’t change my mind.
No proof of god in these I find.
I do not trust in your anecdotes
and neither in your stories, quotes.

All this religious business
stands in a way of progress.
All faith is out of season,
beyond all thought and reason.

Hence, my friends, it is now clear,
All this to me seems very queer.
Let children play with their gods
but to me it makes no odds.

*Painting – “John Brown reading his Bible”, by Horace Pippin, 1942.

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

4 responses to “If God exists, then where he hides?

  1. Falso religion does stand in the way to progress. God both exists and does not exist simultaneously. God is the nothing and void that came before anything and is in zero dimension which cannot be accessed or understood by us. God needs no worship nor understanding. God had no plans. The universe learning to just learning to be self aware. It has operated on unconscious impulse and memory for billions of years. Yes, this unconscious is mind, but not a self aware mind and consciousness that we expect. I have been working on a book about this and the drafts of two chapters can be found at http://whatwonders.blogspot.com/2015/04/god-infinity-and-mobius-universe.html

    • With all due respect but I do not follow your logic or your weird language game you seem to be playing here. I derive nothing from your grand statement but blissful ignorance and self-deception.
      To begin with I don’t understand what do you mean by God. What nothing, what void, what zero dimension? What unconscious impulse and memory? What are you talking about? All this to me sounds like a nonsense talk straight out of some lunatic’s wet dream or psychopath’s nightmare. “God”; “both exists and does not exist simultaneously”; ” God is the nothing and void that came before anything and is in zero dimension which cannot be accessed or understood by us”; ” God needs no worship nor understanding”; “God had no plans.”; “The universe learning to just learning to be self aware. It has operated on unconscious impulse and memory for billions of years. Yes, this unconscious is mind, but not a self aware mind and consciousness that we expect” — All this is just an empty cackle of a drunken fool, insane gibberish of the highest magnitude.
      Your definition of God as something that “both exists and does not exists simultaneously” is entirely nonsensical, logically untenable and intellectually fraudulent language game from the well-known postmodern conventional logic defying repertoire of “having one’s cake and eating it as well”.
      You say that we cannot access or understand God and yet you claim that you have somehow inadvertently accessed and understood God as being “nothing and void that came before anything and is in zero dimension”?
      Does it not strike you as contradictory to say that God “cannot be accessed or understood by us”? For how do you know? How do you assume such grandiose and intimate knowledge about God which according to you is at the same time inaccessible and unintelligible to everyone else?
      If God is, as you say, “the nothing and void that came before anything” and that he “is in zero dimension which” we cannot access or understand, then would you explain to me, an atheist materialist ignoramus, how did you acquired this knowledge or insight? If we cannot understand or access God, then how did you came to this remarkable conclusion about God? How did you accessed and understood God and came to the conclusion that he is neither accessible, nor understandable?
      To presume that God is not intelligible, nor accessible, means to presume that we can acquire knowledge that “he is not intelligible, nor accessible “, which means that he is both intelligible and accessible. For if God is truly neither intelligible, nor accessible, then we cannot know even this – that he is neither intelligible, nor accessible. For to presume that he is neither intelligible, nor accessible is to presume already some knowledge about God and thus he cannot be totally inaccessible or intelligible.
      Then, you claim that God has no plans and he needs no worship. Again, how do you know this unknowable and inaccessible God so well??? Or are just bluffing and playing some kind of a rhetorical language game on me? Why do you need to pretend that you posses knowledge about god which to other mere mortals is inaccessible and which no one can verify or falsify? Moreover, you even pretend further that you know something about the universe and how it becomes self-aware… But you forget to mention that no standard textbook of physics, no respectable physics course or science teacher at our best universities has anything to say about your subjective, deluded, entirely masturbatory fancies like the “unconscious impulse” of the universe or the mind or memory of the universe or the self-awareness of the universe… This is crackpot physics and describes pseudoscience in a nutshell.
      I truly hope that no one buys your book for it offers nothing of value – neither wisdom, nor clarity, nor enlightenment. Only further mindless confusion, junk and nonsense.

  2. You almost drew me into the conversation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s